<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Review: Californication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swanfungus.com/2008/07/tv-review-californication.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2008/07/tv-review-californication.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ego</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2008/07/tv-review-californication.html/comment-page-1#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>ego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/wp/?p=1226#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>If you took a second for air, a brake from the smell of the inside of your own semen painted rectum, you might find watching a TV show in chronological order comes in handy somewhere other than Friends or Seinfeld. I think other people of intelligence will see its referencing as a parallel to &quot;Hank&#039;s&quot; loathing of his immediate environment and as satire through imitation. Overall, its not a story about a writer, but a flawed man who loses sight of what is important and most importantly its about love and the question: is just love alone enough? As for the general plot, I think it is supposed to be a sort of mirroring to Charles Bukowski, who is often nodded to, particularly the novel &quot;Women.&quot; Its a great story of family, albeit rather fucked up,  and love that doesn&#039;t come easy. I&#039;m sorry you haven&#039;t seen the inside of a woman&#039;s vagina without first downloading it, but maybe lay off the empty criticism, based off little to no knowledge, and write something somebody can find a connection with. The character is not swimming through a ocean of pointless pussy because is a writer, half the women don&#039;t know his work, but because he is fearless, confident, and passionate. Drink one more glass of Lindemens Merlot before you decide to puke text all over the digital world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you took a second for air, a brake from the smell of the inside of your own semen painted rectum, you might find watching a TV show in chronological order comes in handy somewhere other than Friends or Seinfeld. I think other people of intelligence will see its referencing as a parallel to &#8220;Hank&#8217;s&#8221; loathing of his immediate environment and as satire through imitation. Overall, its not a story about a writer, but a flawed man who loses sight of what is important and most importantly its about love and the question: is just love alone enough? As for the general plot, I think it is supposed to be a sort of mirroring to Charles Bukowski, who is often nodded to, particularly the novel &#8220;Women.&#8221; Its a great story of family, albeit rather fucked up,  and love that doesn&#8217;t come easy. I&#8217;m sorry you haven&#8217;t seen the inside of a woman&#8217;s vagina without first downloading it, but maybe lay off the empty criticism, based off little to no knowledge, and write something somebody can find a connection with. The character is not swimming through a ocean of pointless pussy because is a writer, half the women don&#8217;t know his work, but because he is fearless, confident, and passionate. Drink one more glass of Lindemens Merlot before you decide to puke text all over the digital world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shala</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2008/07/tv-review-californication.html/comment-page-1#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>shala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/wp/?p=1226#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>the writing is atrocious, it is unacceptable for a programâ€™s writing to be called into question when its central character is himself a writer. How can a series evolve into something special when it revolves around an author who speaks mostly in cliches, and never seems to deliver any effective, thought-provoking line? Are we to believe that the guy is so troubled he is utterly incapable of saying anything inspiring? I mean, I am not even a writer, but even I utter more expressive, stimulating thoughts in a day than Hank Moody (David Duchovny) does in one twenty-eight minute episode</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the writing is atrocious, it is unacceptable for a programâ€™s writing to be called into question when its central character is himself a writer. How can a series evolve into something special when it revolves around an author who speaks mostly in cliches, and never seems to deliver any effective, thought-provoking line? Are we to believe that the guy is so troubled he is utterly incapable of saying anything inspiring? I mean, I am not even a writer, but even I utter more expressive, stimulating thoughts in a day than Hank Moody (David Duchovny) does in one twenty-eight minute episode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

