<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psychic Ills Respond To Pitchfork And Joe Colly!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:35:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swan Fungus &#187; Pitchfork And Joe Colly Repeat Imperfection!</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5210</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan Fungus &#187; Pitchfork And Joe Colly Repeat Imperfection!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-5210</guid>
		<description>[...] about a year ago, Pitchfork staff writer Joe Colly wrote a bizarre, inane review of the latest Psychic Ills record, Mi.... The Pitchfork editorial staff decided on a &#8220;rating&#8221; of 1.4 for the album, which for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about a year ago, Pitchfork staff writer Joe Colly wrote a bizarre, inane review of the latest Psychic Ills record, Mi&#8230;. The Pitchfork editorial staff decided on a &#8220;rating&#8221; of 1.4 for the album, which for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>if you don&#039;t agree with pitchfork, then don&#039;t read it

ps. Animal Collective has, and always will be, 1000x better than psychic ills

stop bitching
 no one cares</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you don&#8217;t agree with pitchfork, then don&#8217;t read it</p>
<p>ps. Animal Collective has, and always will be, 1000x better than psychic ills</p>
<p>stop bitching<br />
 no one cares</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bounty on Psychic Ills, BJM Take the Freak Wagon on Tour, plus Roger Ebert is a Stoner &#124; The Decibel Tolls</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bounty on Psychic Ills, BJM Take the Freak Wagon on Tour, plus Roger Ebert is a Stoner &#124; The Decibel Tolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>[...] Fungus broke this story last week, but since then, the blog entry has disappeared!  Does Pitchfork have wiseguys that pay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fungus broke this story last week, but since then, the blog entry has disappeared!  Does Pitchfork have wiseguys that pay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tart</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>Tart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>Rant on slacker boy! 

xoxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rant on slacker boy! </p>
<p>xoxo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lope</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Lope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Psychic Ills are gods since the song &quot;another day, another night&quot;. Pitchfork&#039;s aeons behind on reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psychic Ills are gods since the song &#8220;another day, another night&#8221;. Pitchfork&#8217;s aeons behind on reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erik</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Are you sure that&#039;s not NASCAR superstar Jimmie Johnson?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure that&#8217;s not NASCAR superstar Jimmie Johnson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyjoe</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/02/psychic-ills-respond-to-pitchfork-and-joe-colly.html/comment-page-1#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>heyjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=2706#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>actually you should still write to pitchfork its pretty preposterous: the review, the rating. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually you should still write to pitchfork its pretty preposterous: the review, the rating. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
