<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Pumpkin Goes To Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swan Fungus &#187; Wuss Fight! Billy Corgan vs. Pavement</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-30408</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan Fungus &#187; Wuss Fight! Billy Corgan vs. Pavement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=3180#comment-30408</guid>
		<description>[...] this afternoon, the frowning prince himself took to Twitter (what&#8217;s that?) to &#8220;slam&#8221; the band who once recorded a song which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this afternoon, the frowning prince himself took to Twitter (what&#8217;s that?) to &#8220;slam&#8221; the band who once recorded a song which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=3180#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t listened to &#039;rock&#039; radio since 1992.  AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t listened to &#8216;rock&#8217; radio since 1992.  AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swan Fungus &#187; Smashing Pumpkins, Shooting Arrows, Pink Elephants, Hangman, Space Bats, Computer Fingers</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-1461</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan Fungus &#187; Smashing Pumpkins, Shooting Arrows, Pink Elephants, Hangman, Space Bats, Computer Fingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=3180#comment-1461</guid>
		<description>[...] then this happened. Four days ago Recording Industry vs. The People picked up on my story about Billy Corgan doing the bidding of his RIAA slave masters, and last night Greg Kot at the Chicago Tribute blogged that Jimmy Chamberlain has left Smashing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then this happened. Four days ago Recording Industry vs. The People picked up on my story about Billy Corgan doing the bidding of his RIAA slave masters, and last night Greg Kot at the Chicago Tribute blogged that Jimmy Chamberlain has left Smashing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quentin Peppersmith</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Quentin Peppersmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=3180#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>And the guys &#039;n&#039; gals making saving billions because of a legal loophole aren&#039;t villains? Admit it, the only reason for this one-sided garbage is because you think that he&#039;s a rich guy whining for more money. And that may be so, but if a struggling independant artist gets their song on the radio, shouldn&#039;t they at least be compensated for the money the radio station gets? How would this make anything worse off for the artist?  And isn&#039;t it Sasha Grey&#039;s birthday? Why can&#039;t a guy go to a friends birthday party, even if he&#039;s a prick and she&#039;s a porn star. (I wonder who pops out of the cake at a porn star&#039;s birthday.....a lawyer?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the guys &#8216;n&#8217; gals making saving billions because of a legal loophole aren&#8217;t villains? Admit it, the only reason for this one-sided garbage is because you think that he&#8217;s a rich guy whining for more money. And that may be so, but if a struggling independant artist gets their song on the radio, shouldn&#8217;t they at least be compensated for the money the radio station gets? How would this make anything worse off for the artist?  And isn&#8217;t it Sasha Grey&#8217;s birthday? Why can&#8217;t a guy go to a friends birthday party, even if he&#8217;s a prick and she&#8217;s a porn star. (I wonder who pops out of the cake at a porn star&#8217;s birthday&#8230;..a lawyer?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Wilhelms</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Wilhelms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=3180#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Mitch Bainwol is flat out lying when he says that half the license revenue will go to artists &quot;regardless of any other contracts.&quot;  

The current language of the bill before Congress guarantees the 50% for artists only if the broadcaster agrees to the statutory license rates and do not attempt to negotiate a lower overall rate.  If they negotiate a lower rate, ALL the money goes to the label and they get to pay the artist &quot;according to their contracts.&quot;

Do you think ClearChannel is not going to look to reduce it&#039;s overall royalty obligation by negotiating a lower rate, say at 75% of the statutory rate?

Do you think the labels aren&#039;t going to agree to that 75% rate when they get to keep almost all that money, rather than just the 50% of the full statutory rate?   

The only ones screwed by this arrangement are the artists.  Billy Corgan has betrayed all artists by speaking up for this scam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch Bainwol is flat out lying when he says that half the license revenue will go to artists &#8220;regardless of any other contracts.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The current language of the bill before Congress guarantees the 50% for artists only if the broadcaster agrees to the statutory license rates and do not attempt to negotiate a lower overall rate.  If they negotiate a lower rate, ALL the money goes to the label and they get to pay the artist &#8220;according to their contracts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you think ClearChannel is not going to look to reduce it&#8217;s overall royalty obligation by negotiating a lower rate, say at 75% of the statutory rate?</p>
<p>Do you think the labels aren&#8217;t going to agree to that 75% rate when they get to keep almost all that money, rather than just the 50% of the full statutory rate?   </p>
<p>The only ones screwed by this arrangement are the artists.  Billy Corgan has betrayed all artists by speaking up for this scam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://www.swanfungus.com/2009/03/the-great-pumpkin-goes-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Beckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swanfungus.com/?p=3180#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>1. Great article.

2. Billy Corgan is the RIAA&#039;s bitch, and an Uncle Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Great article.</p>
<p>2. Billy Corgan is the RIAA&#8217;s bitch, and an Uncle Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

